[Dixielandjazz] Truth and negativity
Chris Tyle
jazzchops at isp.com
Sun Dec 30 13:34:45 PST 2007
Steve Barbone wrote:
Not a negative statement Chris, just the plain unvarnished truth. I am one
of those who makes the dying off statement. And since I am almost a decade
older than 65, I am talking about my own generation. Would it be better to
lie? Those my age are likely aware of their mortality.
I think all of us on the DJML KNOW that a segment of the audience is
passing on. I've been working the festival circuit regularly since the
mid-1980s, and that's always been the case, so the point doesn't need to
be hammered in with weekly regularity. It's not necessary to state the
bleedin' obvious, imo.
But I also see this kind of "truth" as being damaging in the long run.
There are festivals directors who are some of our listmates, and they
don't need to be reminded with regularity that their festival audience
is dwindling. On the other hand, if in our discussions here we can put
forth positive suggestions on ways to increase those audiences, it makes
more sense than being "truthful." For example, if a friend is sick,
which is going to be better, to be truthful and tell them they look bad,
or try to make them feel better by telling them they look great? There
are powerful connections between mind and body.
There's a difference between stating what you believe to be the truth
and having the sense to be judicious in your choice of words. This is
what I was alluding to when I mentioned that we would be better off
being proactive rather than negative, which, btw, was a suggestion and
not any attempt by me to "police" the list. I don't think any us would
deny each other their freedom of speech, but there is such a thing as
being selective in what you write, and having the intelligence to
understand the difference.
Regards,
Chris Tyle
More information about the Dixielandjazz
mailing list