[Dixielandjazz] A rant on the unamplifi...and sound systems
GWW174 at aol.com
GWW174 at aol.com
Tue Jan 28 11:07:01 PST 2003
In a message dated 1/23/03 9:47:18 AM Pacific Standard Time,
paul.edgerton at eds.com writes:
> The antidote to all of this is exemplified by the Jim Cullum band. Every
> time I have heard them, they've been unamplified. Yes, there may be a PA
> system, but that's not what sets the volume on the stage -- the musicians
> themselves do.
>
> Somehow, they manage to balance horns with unamplified acoustic
> instruments.
> The trumpet dominates the ensemble sound, as it should. Every instrument
> can
> be heard in its proper acoustic perspective. When a softer instrument gets
> a
> solo, the others just PLAY SOFTER.
>
As a sound system designer and operator, the best compliment I get from the
audience is "Oh, I didn't know there was a sound system". That is the way
it should be - but given budgets, physical and pther constraints, it is not
always easy. Over the years the term "PA" (Public address) has given way to
the term SOUND REINFORCEMENT. The purpose of the equipment is to re-inforce
the accoustic sound made by the source - i.e. talkers or musicians. If done
properly, the audience is unaware of a sound system. That is the way it
should be.
Gordon of Northridge
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ml.islandnet.com/pipermail/dixielandjazz/attachments/20030128/6004db71/attachment.html
More information about the Dixielandjazz
mailing list