[Dixielandjazz] CD Costs & Profit
Rorel at aol.com
Rorel at aol.com
Thu Mar 1 03:44:21 PST 2007
In a message dated 2/28/2007 4:31:30 PM Eastern Standard Time,
barbonestreet at earthlink.net writes:
"Robert S. Ringwald" <robert at ringwald.com> wrote (polite snip)
> Ray, one flaw in your figures is not figuring in the cost of recording,
> mixing, mastering, art work, type setting. Also, payment to your
musicians.
>
> This can run into thousands of dollars.
Amen Bob. I pay the sidemen $1 for each CD sold in lieu of a performance fee
up front. Thus on 900 CDs sold, the 5 sidemen get a total of $4500. Plus out
of every 1000 CDs made, at least 100 are given away as promos, or used as
marketing tools, etc., which lowers the gross by another $1500. That's $6000
less in profit assuming Ray's original calculations were right.
Not exactly, Bob. I did leave an amount in my numbers for sidemen. You are
very generous with your sidemen and I dare say that a regular band of a
bunch of cronies who play together all the time could bring it in for less. As
to promos, well, you elect to give those away and could just as easily sell
them. For guys like us, I think ALL the CDs manufactured are basically promo
CDs because, While our figures may differ somewhat and we do turn a marginal
profit, that is not really the point. you and I and others out there know
that we aren;t going to get rich selling self-produced CDs off the bandstand.
We sell them for people to take home and hopefully, play and enjoy and tell
their friends so they lead to more bookings. They are more for marketing than
sales.
FYI - you do not have to pay Mechanical Royalties to the Harry Fox Agency on
Promo copies, if you pay at all, and that increases your profit on those 100
by about a buck a record.
The key is to make a budget and stick to it. There is no reason in the
world why a self-produced CD should cost as much as Mr. Metz' Bob Cats record or
my David 'Fathead' Newman record. If it does, something's wrong.
Not to mention that at legitimate charity events (where we get paid to
perform) we rebate $5 per CD sold back to the charity as a contribution.
Again, that is your decision, and a laudable one too. It is not required.
And if you sell CDs on certain cruise gigs, or at certain jazz festivals,
the cruise line, or cruise booking agent, or festival producer with their
greed driven mindset often charges anywhere from 10 to 25% commission.
Agreed! Wholeheartedly. Many clubs in New York City do the same thing.
When my wife and I go to hear Vince Giordano at the Iridium, we drop $150 a
couple and i am sure the club is still taking a cut from Vince. That just ain't
right.
Who gets screwed? The performing artist. But then, what's new about that?
But, to harken back to my original post, who gets screwed by not paying to
use a protected tune? The composer. It is no justification to break the law
because the composer is dead. Their estate gets the money. (I am referring
to other posts, not Steve's quoted herein). A song is a product just like a
car, a toaster or a blackhead eradicator. Nobody would think they could go
into a store and leave with a blackhead eradicator without paying for it so
why all this hub-bub about paying on a song?
RECAP: Yes, it is difficult, but not impossible, to turn a profit on a
self-produced CD. Careful budgeting can leave you with some cash at the end of
the day. But if your budget approaches that of Nagel Heyer you are doomed to
failure.
Yes, it seems that a lot of people want a piece of our pie. The only ones
are really entitled to it are the composers of the protected tunes we use and
their estates.
I'd love to hear one of your CDs Steve. Contact me off-list if you'd like
to arrange a sale.
Ray Osnato
<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free
email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at
http://www.aol.com.
More information about the Dixielandjazz
mailing list