[Dixielandjazz] Offended by Dixieland?

Chuck Kercher ekercher@tampabay.rr.com
Mon, 5 Aug 2002 23:03:13 -0400


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C23CD4.466BD300
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Amen, Amen, and Amen! chuck
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: JimDBB@aol.com=20
  To: dixielandjazz@ml.islandnet.com=20
  Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 12:14 PM
  Subject: Re: [Dixielandjazz] Offended by Dixieland?


  In a message dated 8/5/02 9:23:25 AM Central Daylight Time, =
barbonestreet@earthlink.net writes:



    Hear hear. Speaking of "Jazz Aficionados" aren't they just older =
people
    who when they were young, like the audiences Charlie and I target, =
were
    "just people looking for happy  music . . . or party attendees..." =
That
    was of course, before they became knowledgeable aficionados. :-)

    Heck, I only know about 100 "knowledgeable jazz aficionados" and =
they
    can't seem to agree on anything except the importance of their own
    diverse and often conflicting opinions. Not a big enough audience to
    target. And not much fun in a group by themselves.

    Plain speak: If you are looking for intellectual music Dixieland =
ain't
    it. What we would like to believe, as musically informed Dixieland
    aficionados, is/was art form dixieland between 1920 and 1940, is/was
    simply warmed over pop music done in a jazzy style. Real jazz, yes
    before 1920 and after 1940. It's peak, Eddie Condon groups, 1940 to
    1975, and the groups at the Metropole in NYC.  (My opinion, maybe =
not
    yours)

    And those groups were fun. Biggest problem they had was that they =
were
    in clubs where you couldn't dance. (That damn 20% tax on dance =
joints)
    Those bands, black and white, were fun. The laughed, they hollered, =
they
    had a good time, and the audience did too.

    Now, we aficionados say, "keep the dancers in the back, we want to
    listen and not be distracted". Are we kidding? Listen to what?

    Cheers,
    Steve Barbone


     Excellent statement, Steve.  thanks for writing and posting it.  =
Especially the slot about the '100 knowledgeable jazz afficionados'.  =
You hit that one right on the head.

     Jim Beebe=20

------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C23CD4.466BD300
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Amen, Amen, and Amen! =
chuck</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3DJimDBB@aol.com =
href=3D"mailto:JimDBB@aol.com">JimDBB@aol.com</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A=20
  title=3Ddixielandjazz@ml.islandnet.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:dixielandjazz@ml.islandnet.com">dixielandjazz@ml.islandnet=
.com</A>=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, August 05, 2002 =
12:14=20
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Dixielandjazz] =
Offended by=20
  Dixieland?</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT size=3D2>In a =
message dated=20
  8/5/02 9:23:25 AM Central Daylight Time, <A=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:barbonestreet@earthlink.net">barbonestreet@earthlink.net</=
A>=20
  writes:<BR><BR><BR>
  <BLOCKQUOTE=20
  style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px =
solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"=20
  TYPE=3D"CITE">Hear hear. Speaking of "Jazz Aficionados" aren't they =
just older=20
    people<BR>who when they were young, like the audiences Charlie and I =
target,=20
    were<BR>"just people looking for happy&nbsp; music . . . or party=20
    attendees..." That<BR>was of course, before they became =
knowledgeable=20
    aficionados. :-)<BR><BR>Heck, I only know about 100 "knowledgeable =
jazz=20
    aficionados" and they<BR>can't seem to agree on anything except the=20
    importance of their own<BR>diverse and often conflicting opinions. =
Not a big=20
    enough audience to<BR>target. And not much fun in a group by=20
    themselves.<BR><BR>Plain speak: If you are looking for intellectual =
music=20
    Dixieland ain't<BR>it. What we would like to believe, as musically =
informed=20
    Dixieland<BR>aficionados, is/was art form dixieland between 1920 and =
1940,=20
    is/was<BR>simply warmed over pop music done in a jazzy style. Real =
jazz,=20
    yes<BR>before 1920 and after 1940. It's peak, Eddie Condon groups, =
1940=20
    to<BR>1975, and the groups at the Metropole in NYC.&nbsp; (My =
opinion, maybe=20
    not<BR>yours)<BR><BR>And those groups were fun. Biggest problem they =
had was=20
    that they were<BR>in clubs where you couldn't dance. (That damn 20% =
tax on=20
    dance joints)<BR>Those bands, black and white, were fun. The =
laughed, they=20
    hollered, they<BR>had a good time, and the audience did =
too.<BR><BR>Now, we=20
    aficionados say, "keep the dancers in the back, we want to<BR>listen =
and not=20
    be distracted". Are we kidding? Listen to =
what?<BR><BR>Cheers,<BR>Steve=20
    Barbone</BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp; Excellent statement, =
Steve.&nbsp;=20
  thanks for writing and posting it.&nbsp; Especially the slot about the =
'100=20
  knowledgeable jazz afficionados'.&nbsp; You hit that one right on the=20
  head.<BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp; Jim Beebe</FONT> =
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0028_01C23CD4.466BD300--