[Dixielandjazz] FW: FW: Hearing the music
W1AB at aol.com
W1AB at aol.com
Sat Jun 19 15:04:04 PDT 2010
I'm not sure about your speed question, Harry, but here's a guess: The
technology for making the heads improved so much by the time audio cassettes
came along that you could get up to 20 kHz at 1-7/8 ips. At the time
reel-to-reel machines were in use, head technology wouldn't have been as far
along.
For a while, back in the 1960s, I worked with 120 ips machines that
pulled 2-inch tape, for high-resolution video and multiplexed telemetry
signals. Amazing stuff.
Wikipedia has a nice write-up on tape recorders:
_Click here: Reel-to-reel audio tape recording - Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia_ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reel-to-reel_audio_tape_recording)
Al B
In a message dated 6/19/2010 5:10:48 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
meetmrcallaghan at gmail.com writes:
The one thing that has never been explained to me though, is back in the
day's of reel-to-reel tapes, we were told that for superior sound, one
should record music at 7 1/2 ips rather than 3 3/4 ips and most machines
had
both speeds available.on them.
Yet, when audio cassettes came along, they were recorded at 1 7/8 ips
Doesn't that kind of contradict the theory applied to the reel-to-reels of
getting superior sound at the higher speed?.
Someone once told me that professional studios even had the capability of
recording reel-to-reels at 15 ips
I'm sure the answer is quite simple and I will not be in the least bit
embarassed if it has to be explained to me, otherwise I would not have even
brought up the subject.in the first place
More information about the Dixielandjazz
mailing list