[Dixielandjazz] FW: Re Hoagy's'New Orleans'

Jim Kashishian jim at kashprod.com
Sat Sep 30 05:47:42 PDT 2006


I'm sending this again to DJML as I didn't get it in my DJML mailbox, but
Igor got it through DJML, as he answered me!  Wonder why that happened?
Want to see if this repeat message arrives back to me.  Sorry for the
repeat, if it does turn out to be a repeat for others on the list.

Jim


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Kashishian [mailto:jim at kashprod.com] 
Sent: sábado, 30 de septiembre de 2006 13:59
To: 'dixielandjazz at ml.islandnet.com'
Subject: FW: [Dixielandjazz] Re Hoagy's'New Orleans'


>Re Kash's last email ....In my ignorance I was not aware of a bridge 
>for New Orleans, we must play a truncated version, just a 16 bar in Gm.  
>IGOR


Ok, you got me, Igor!  Although it's not really a bridge (as in a 32 bar
song of AABA), I always think of the first 4 bars of the second eight bars
as a bridge.  
The D9/Eb9 D7 Gm/A7 D7 bit is different than the other sections of four
bars. 

If you think of the song as being played in double the time, you'd end up
with the required 32 bars & a proper bridge. I'm referring to the fact that
it could have been written as each half bar being a full bar. It could just
as easily been penned that way, I suppose.  Is there a technical or creative
reason the song was written as a 16 bar song, but feels like a 32 bar song?
Where does Hoagy's genius shine through in this matter?  I'm sure someone
with tremendous chordal understanding will have an answer.

Last night I only soloed on the first 8 bars of the last chorus, and the
trumpeter picked up the melody at the (so-called) bridge to finish the song
off, as I felt the (slow, pretty)song was getting a bit long for an audience
showing a desire for up-tempo things.  

Jim


 




More information about the Dixielandjazz mailing list