[Dixielandjazz] Post-Genre Music?
tcashwigg at aol.com
tcashwigg at aol.com
Sun Dec 31 14:16:26 PST 2006
Much of it still is in many parts of Europe as well, I have played
Jazz Festivals with the likes of James Brown, Little Richard, Bo
Diddley, Dionne WarwicK, Chuck Berry, Van Morrison, Fats, Domino,
Chaka Kahn, Patti Labelle, Sister Sledge, Solomon Burke, The
Commodores, Kool & The Gang, Brides of Funkenstein, B.B. King, Buddy
Guy, Ike Turner, and many others with all of them being billed as Jazz
from the USA. We have also of course played with many legitimate Jazz
artists of many sub genres of Jazz as well.
I don't have a problem with it, so long as they keep paying us well and
selling out the festivals and providing us with great appreciative
audience to work to. I too am from the school of thought that Jazz
encompasses a lot more than just Traditional or Dixieland and I do like
and appreciate many styles of it.
Cheers,
Tom Wiggins
-----Original Message-----
From: nmboym at 012.net.il
To: tcashwigg at aol.com
Sent: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Dixielandjazz] Post-Genre Music?
Funny thing, that generation matter: when I was young, any Western
music was considered jazz in Poland, including Rock&Roll. It took me a
while to realize it was not (it was, after all, my generation's music).
The learning process included running away from my boarding school to
see Elvis Presley films, only to learn I did not like the music. So
I've stayed with jazz. It took me another few years to realize that
there was a lot of "Unreal Jazz" (a title of a Hugues Panassie article)
- Miles Davis, Brubeck, Coltrane - and stick to OKOM.
Cheers
----- Original Message ----- From: <tcashwigg at aol.com>
To: <dixielandjazz at ml.islandnet.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Dixielandjazz] Post-Genre Music?
>
> Nope ! does not lend itself well to Marketing, and if a newbie heard
> some MUSIC that they did not like and that was their only experience
at
> say a live music event, they would probably turn away and not go to
> another one. :))
>
> Would be the same situation of just calling it generic "BEER", the
> advertising industry would just lose far too much money and jobs,
the
> newbies like to Discover things and cherish them as something they
> found all on their own without mom & dad forcing them to accept it.
>
> Sort of like many of my generation took on Rock & Roll to get away
from
> many of those so called Hep Cats who looked really funny to us at
that
> age, not to mention how funny they dressed all trying to look like
Mr.
> Rogers, or Andy Williams. :)) I guess Woody Allen is still trying to
> look like that.
>
> Real Musicians and Successful entertainers have mostly tended to
dress
> for success and that meant dress up better than your audiences if
> possible, or at least suitable to be in their company. I never saw
> Louis Armstrong without a suit, and also never saw John Lee Hooker
> without a Suit on, even working in his garden. Hey even Doctors put
> on Uniforms to identify them as Doctors and add to their respect,
would
> you go into any hospital and let some guy who looked like a cabbie
or
> plumber operate on you ? :)) I don't think so.
>
> I say let's put some class back into the Music and on the stage and
we
> will see some class come back to the audience, and maybe even start
to
> attract an audience again. :)) There are a lot more of them than us
> folks, and J.C. Penny said the Customer is always Right, and I
believe
> in that theory even if I know the customers is dead wrong, so what!
> he/she paid so we should do all we can within reason to make them
happy
> and keep 'em coming back, there are of course a few exceptions to
this
> as we have discussed on here before. :))
>
> Leave them with a pleasing and good experience, "That is what they
came
> for" unless of course they are throwing rotten veggies at you.!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tom "Do it right and get the Hell out of Town with the Money"
Wiggins
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DWSI at aol.com
> To: dixielandjazz at ml.islandnet.com
> Sent: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 3:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [Dixielandjazz] Post-Genre Music?
>
> All of the talk about getting the youth into OKOM seems to assume
> our
> musical category is a sub category of the bigger category generally
> called
> "jazz."
> At Rutgers Unviersity, where I manage the adult education courses in
> writing,
> (when I'm not playing ragtime piano), one teacher came up with a
course
>
> called Post-Genre Poetry. In it, he assumes that poetry has moved
> beyond genres,
>
> or types or categories of music, and now poets are more or less free
> agents.
> As I think about it, isn't that what has happened to an awful lot of
> art
> forms? We've heard of fusion, and cross-over, but what if there
isn't
> any more
> need for the traditional genres? What if it's just "music" from here
> on? Does
> this work for anyone out there?
>
> Dan (backup piano) Spink
> _______________________________________________
> Dixielandjazz mailing list
> Dixielandjazz at ml.islandnet.com
> http://ml.islandnet.com/mailman/listinfo/dixielandjazz
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
> Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and
> security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from
> across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dixielandjazz mailing list
> Dixielandjazz at ml.islandnet.com
> http://ml.islandnet.com/mailman/listinfo/dixielandjazz
>
>
#########################################################################
############
> This Mail Was Scanned by 012.net AntiVirus Service1- Powered by
TrendMicro > Interscan
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and
security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from
across the web, free AOL Mail and more.
More information about the Dixielandjazz
mailing list