[Dixielandjazz] Re: "Jazz"
slholzer at iquest.net
Sun Nov 23 14:15:34 PST 2003
Even if the audience consists only of the artist, art still depends on
the audience. A better question is whether art that appeals only to the
audience of one has any significance to the greater world. I submit
that it does not.
Bill Gunter wrote:
> Hi all,
> David Littlefield writes:
>> I believe that Art can exist independently of audience. But once one
>> it public it enters the field of entertainment.
> Sort of a fascinating question, ain't it? Can art exist independently
> of audience?
> It's like that old saw about "If a tree falls in the forest and nobody
> is there to hear it does it make a noise? Hmmmm.
> It doesn't seem quite logical to me to argue that Art can exist
> without being entertaining.
> Is a beautiful sunset "Art?"
> If it's ugly is it "Art?"
> If I don't think it's "Art" is is still "Art?"
> If a rock on the beach is not "Art" but I put a frame around it is it
> now "Art?"
> If I sing a song but my intonation, rhythm, meter and phrasing is all
> wrong is it "Art?"
> Sheesh . . .
> I'll have to ponder this a bit more.
> Respectfully submitted,
> Bill "Did Jackson Pollock create Art?" Gunter
> jazzboard at hotmail.com
> Set yourself up for fun at home! Get tips on home entertainment
> equipment, video game reviews, and more here.
> Dixielandjazz mailing list
> Dixielandjazz at ml.islandnet.com
More information about the Dixielandjazz