[Dixielandjazz] Age and Sects

[john petters]

Dan Said
>We also need to PUSH our music that we play and like in front of crowds of
younger folks, 'cause they will like >some of it, given to chance to hear
it.
Exactly. Have the courage of your convictions. If you play Hot Classic Jazz,
Dixieland , New Orleans or Swing play it - don't try to change your style.
Adapt new songs to your style if you can find any. As I said when Ory played
Perdido he sounded like Ory and not Duke. When he played In The Mood he did
not sound like Glen Miller. Problem is how do you take a Spice Girls song
and make any music out of it  - let alone jazz
John Petters
Amateur Radio Station G3YPZ
www.traditional-jazz.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Augustine" <ds.augustine at mail.utexas.edu>
To: "Dixieland Jazz Mailing List" <dixielandjazz at ml.islandnet.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 4:16 PM
Subject: [Dixielandjazz] Age and Sects


> DJML--
>     It seems to be one of the inescapable accompaniments of aging that a
person will gradually listen to less unfamiliar music.  (Same is true for
reading books, and trying new things in general.)
>     Younger folks, in their teens through their early adult years, like to
try new things, sometimes finding some that they enjoy.  They hold on to
those they like, and over the years they (well, OK, we) decrease trying new
stuff.
>     Pity.
>     I'm of the opinion that there haven't been any good songs written
since (oh, say) 1980, but the rational part of me says that's simply not
true--i just haven't HEARD any good songs because i haven't made the effort
to LISTEN to new songs.  And why is that, pray tell?  Because the
ever-decreasing samples of new music i happen to hear i don't like, so i
gratuitously consign ALL that music to the rubbish heap.
>     Anything unfamiliar is immediately suspect to the human mind.  We
congregate into sects of the mind that discard any noncongruent elements,
but this lump in the landscape of the human logic may not be a good thing to
have, for any reason.  Still, it's understandable, if not necessarily
beneficial.
>     And, in fact, the converse can be true.  A lot of young folks know a
lot about music since 1980, but they don't know anything about some of the
great songs written and performed well in the 1960's, 1940's, 1920's, etc.
This is because they don't listen to songs or performers of that era.
>     What to do?
>     One of my favorite writers (whom i discovered while writing my
dissertation), Alfred North Whitehead, said that ""An unflinching
determination to take the whole evidence into account is the only method of
preservation against the fluctuating extremes of fashionable opinion."  So
we need to steel our nerves and grit our teeth and wade into new stuff every
so often.  We also need to PUSH our music that we play and like in front of
crowds of younger folks, 'cause they will like some of it, given to chance
to hear it.
>     In other words, try it, you'll like (some of) it.
>
>     Dan
> --
> **----------------------------------------------------------**
> ** Dan Augustine - ds.augustine at mail.utexas.edu             **
> ** Office of Admissions, University of Texas; Austin, Texas **
> **----------------------------------------------------------**
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dixielandjazz mailing list
> Dixielandjazz at ml.islandnet.com
> http://ml.islandnet.com/mailman/listinfo/dixielandjazz