[Dixielandjazz] George Buck's definition (was Type of Jazz - Revisited)
Sun, 15 Sep 2002 16:51:10 -0400
George Buck certainly knows his jazz he has been specializing in sell jazz
records for decades. I agree he makes a lot of sense and has a valid
As he puts it (from his perspective as a purist) "Dixieland" is a place,
rather than a type of music. the idea of just two basic types - New Orleans
or Chicago is very attractive, though of course, both of these names/styles
are "places" too, which rather muddies the water!
Hot Five Jazzmakers, Toronto, Canada
Band web site: http://hotfivejazz.tripod.com
From: "Thompson" <email@example.com>
To: "DJML" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 8:54 AM
Subject: [Dixielandjazz] Type of Jazz - Revisited
> As Paul Harvey would say, "This is from the 'For What It Is Worth'
> Last week, George Buck was on WWOZ Radio out of New Orleans, and
> expressed HIS opinion about the labels applied to music. He states he
> is a "Jazz Purist" and realizes everyone does not agree with him.
> However, he says that in the early days, the music was referred to as
> Jazz and everyone knew what that was. He calls it "authentic jazz".
> Since those early days, all sorts of music have picked up on that name
> and many times the label comes from the press. He classifies Jazz in
> two categories: New Orleans Jazz and Chicago Jazz. He says that even
> "West Coast" has its roots in either of these two types. To him,
> Dixieland is a location, not a type of music. Swing is another category
> although it may have elements of jazz in it.
> Rebecca Thompson
> Flower Mound, Texas
> Dixielandjazz mailing list