[Dixielandjazz] JAZZ
Stephen Barbone
barbonestreet@earthlink.net
Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:50:10 -0400
For those who think of jazz as the
exclusive domain
of the intellectual,
the best approach
is to begin with the
earthy roots of
the music. Jazz was
born a polyglot
combination of
disparate
influences among the
common people,
and grew in
popularity as an
alternative music to
the hokey,
sentimental popular
songs of the
time. Jazz was the punk
of its day, a
dangerous noise from
the edges of
society. Louis Armstrong
was just as
threatening to middle
America in 1927
as Johnny Rotten
was in 1977.
While it is true
that jazz fans tend to
be smarter than
average (smarter,
and more
attractive), it is not in the best interest of the music
that it be
relegated to a strictly elitist art. Jazz, at its best, carries
the universality
of human emotion to the heart more directly than
any other music.
Coming from its greatest voices, it is the
distilled essence
of being. Jazz is probably the most human of
music, because
the rules of music bend to the artist rather than
vice versa. And,
perhaps most significantly, the right jazz has the
ability to loosen
undergarments faster than anything Barry White
ever recorded.
In summary, the
way to overcome the impression that jazz is for
highbrows rests
in five simple words: Jazz can get you laid.
A similar
impression of jazz is that it is indecipherable noise. This
idea comes mainly
from the fact that the instruments within a
jazz ensemble
don’t always behave in the expected manner. The
drums don’t
always maintain a comforting boom chick boom chick
to mark the time
in precise, even measures. The bass isn’t
content to
confine itself to the first and fifth of the scale. The
piano sometimes
plays jangling, discordant clusters of notes
rather than
soothing streams of agreeable tones. Soloists aren’t
bound to the
immediate notes of the melody, or even the
corporate notes
of the underlying chords. The comforting
sameness of
popular music is nowhere to be found, and the
tinselly
blandishments that decorate endless rows of
indistinguishable
pop stars are equally absent.
To win this sort of person over to
jazz, it is necessary to take them
inside the music. They must
understand the absolute freedom
of jazz, the dedication to individual
expression even within a group
dynamic that makes jazz
completely unique among types of
music. Introduce them to the
personalities involved, how
individual contributions came
together to create a new entity.
Illustrate the differences between
the wonderfully unique people who
created jazz and
the faceless flavors-of-the-month that populate
the landscape of
top forty music.
In summary, the
way to overcome the impression that jazz is just
random noise is
to explain the people who created, prospered,
and perpetuate
it. And on a side note, $50 says that Diana Krall
could take
Britney Spears in a fair fight.
For the absolute
newbie--that
is, someone who
has no
opinion of jazz
whatsoever—it
is only necessary
to share
your favorite
music, and your
enthusiasm, with
them. How
often have all of
us been
exposed to
something we
might not have
liked otherwise
and convinced of
its merits by
someone whose
opinion we
trust and
respect? Be careful,
however, not to
come on too
strong. The lure
of seduction
is the best path
to disarm the
sure resistance
to the unfamiliar. How do you think I got into the
überblonde’s
apartment in the first place?
My point exactly.
In summary, the
quickest way to get jazz to the heart of a newbie
is to send it
from yours.
So there you have
it, a few handy tips for overcoming
preconceived
notions of jazz and for bringing it to fresh ears. And
in the bargain, a
neat lesson in how to coast through a perfectly
passable monthly
column without an ounce of inspiration or a
single original
thought in your head. This is why I am a Genius.
Till next month,
kids, exit to your right and enjoy the rest of AAJ.