[Dixielandjazz] New List Server (about moderators)

[Vilcad (Ron Gable)]

Fellow listers,

I'm new to this mail list, haven't been on one for years.  This is maybe the
fourth response I've submitted.
I did in fact receive a message from the list moderator, disallowing one of
my replies to the list.  I believe I know the reason.
My mail program is set up to send and receive from three different accounts
(e-mail address) and the one I used to send my reply from in not the e-mail
address that I had used to register on the list.  Therefore the list program
could not verify my name and sent me a pre-recorded message "from the
moderator", which is verbiage in the mail program and not a real person.

Another subject, I have not and will not send attachments to this list.
That the easy part, the hard part for me is to remember to go into the tools
option in my mail program and setting to plain text.  I have done this for
this message. Since I do much work that requires using html format in
e-mails, I'm going to have to remember to make the switch each time.  I'm
new to this idea about plain text and not sure or the reasoning, but will do
my best.

Ron & Rosemary Gable
Jazz Advocates
10790 W. National Road
Brookville, Ohio 45309
(937) 833-4053
www.jazzadvocate.com
rongable@jazzadvocate.com
Join the Advocate Movement
at www.jazzadvocate.com

##########################################

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Barbone" <barbonestreet@earthlink.net>
To: "Robert Ringwald" <ringwald@calweb.com>
Cc: "Dixieland Jazz Mailing List" <dixielandjazz@ml.islandnet.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:31 PM
Subject: [Dixielandjazz] New List Server


> Bob Ringwald & List mates
>
> Thanks Bob for your hard work in getting us on a server that doesn't
> keep bouncing us off. Regarding the flap about "moderators", someone
> posted a message last week, that one of his answering messages to the
> list was denied pending a decision by the "list moderator" as to whether
> or not it was relevent. I suspect that it was another chat list where
> that occurred, rather than this one because as you state, there has been
> no moderator here, except in cases where folks get way over the top in
> form or content.